![]()
It's no secret that I'm a proponent of goal setting as a tool for achieving success. So it was with great interest that I read a recently released Harvard Business School Working Paper that explored the potential negative side effects of goal setting in an organizational environment.
The paper, Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Over-Prescribing Goal Setting, explores the premise that indiscriminate goal-setting in organizations can have a number of harmful side-effects. Among them are:
The paper is well researched (no surprise there) and provides a balanced look at both the risks and rewards of goal setting in an organizational environment. It includes a set of 10 questions to help leaders determine whether goals are the best method for motivating their employees:
The authors' conclusion is a sound one:
"Rather than dispensing goal setting as a benign, over-the-counter treatment for students of management, experts need to conceptualize goal setting as a prescription-strength medication that requires careful dosing, consideration of harmful side effect, and close supervision."
Goals Gone Wild:The Systematic Side Effects of Over-Prescribing Goal Setting is an important look at the dark side of goal setting that I highly recommend to anyone with an interest in the topic. Having read it myself I can't say that I disagree with the authors' conclusions. To paraphrase a statement that appears on my home page, "Goal setting done right can transform your organization. Done wrong, it can destroy it."